To clarify, scenarios such as:
1) A person ignoring "no trespassing" signage and fencing/etc and enters said land and gets hurt (such as stepping on a rake or other sharp tool) or triggering a non-lethal trap.
2) Someone willfully and knowingly stealing food from a communal refrigerator (like in an office, or a dwelling full of roommates) and happens to eat something with laxatives or something they may be allergic to.
3) Or a theif falls through a skylight of his target's home and gets cut on a kitchen knife upon landing.
In cases like these, the person committing the initial crime has sometimes sued and/or pressed charges against the property or food owner.
This is just wrong. I honestly believe when a person violates another, they should loose the right to sue or press charges should they get hurt while committing the crime.
To be clear, however, I'm not really advocating the use of booby traps or any deadly automated apparatus, or in the case of food, blatantly poisoning, but rather just that one shouldn't be able to use the system against someone they were actively and knowingly violating.
Submitted June 03, 2016 at 06:27AM by alanjf http://ift.tt/1UksZHv changemyview
No comments:
Post a Comment